Audio-Technica M60x & Audio-Technica M50x share many similarities, but there are also important differences, such as quality, performance, features, design, and connectivity. If you want the best one between them, I Would recommend the Audio-Technica M60x rather than the Audio-Technica M50x.
Why Do I Recommend The Audio-Technica M60x?
- The Audio-Technica ATH-M60x features a more neutral and analytical sound signature for accurate critical listening and precise mixing, while the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x has a slightly V-shaped tuning.
- Audio-Technica ATH-M60x has a lighter clamp force for improved long-term comfort during continuous use, whereas the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x has a tighter clamp that can cause pressure on the head.
- It comes with low-profile on-ear pads to maintain better situational awareness in broadcast and live production, while the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x uses thick over-ear pads that block more environmental sound.
- The Audio-Technica ATH-M60x includes a slimmer, low-profile headband for reduced bulk and easier storage in tight spaces, whereas the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x uses a bulkier padded headband.
- It has minimal ear cup rotation to maintain a consistent fit and seal during active movements, while the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x has 90° swiveling cups.
- The Audio-Technica ATH-M60x is built with reinforced components for field durability in ENG and on-location recording, whereas the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x is designed with standard studio-grade durability.
- Audio-Technica ATH-M60x comes with a slimmer connector housing that fits more easily into compact audio devices, while the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x uses a larger connector housing.
Maybe the Audio-Technica M50x price can make you comfortable because it’s a little bit cheaper than the Audio-Technica M60x. But you have to compromise all the above-mentioned features. Now the Decision is Yours. I hope it was helpful to choose the right one.
Side By Side Comparison
| Feature | Audio-Technica M60x | Audio-Technica M50x |
| Design Type | On-ear, low-profile closed-back | Over-ear, closed-back |
| Driver Size | 45 mm large-aperture dynamic drivers | 45 mm large-aperture dynamic drivers |
| Frequency Response | 15 Hz – 28 kHz | 15 Hz – 28 kHz |
| Impedance | 38 ohms | 38 ohms |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB | 99 dB |
| Weight (without cable) | 200 g | 285 g |
| Ear Pad Type | Memory foam, leatherette, low-profile on-ear | Thick circumaural leatherette over-ear |
| Headband Padding | Slim, firm padding | Thicker, softer padding |
| Portability | Non-foldable ear cups | Foldable ear cups |
| Sound Signature | Neutral, analytical | Slightly V-shaped, bass-emphasized |
| Isolation Level | Moderate | Higher |
| Cable Type | Detachable with locking mechanism | Detachable with locking mechanism |
| Included Cables | 1.2 m straight, 3.0 m straight, 1.2 m coiled | 1.2 m straight, 3.0 m straight, 1.2 m coiled |
| Connector Housing Fit | Designed for slimmer on-ear cups | Designed for deeper over-ear cups |
| Clamp Force | Lighter clamp | Tighter clamp |
| Ear Cup Rotation | Minimal rotation | 90° swivel capability |
| Durability Build Focus | Reinforced for field use | Standard studio durability |
| Primary Target Use | Broadcast, ENG, close-contact monitoring | Studio recording, mixing, casual listening |
| Price | Check Technica M60x Price | Check Technica M50x Price |
What Common Both Can Do?
Driver Size: Both headphones feature 45 mm large-aperture dynamic drivers, delivering detailed and accurate audio reproduction suitable for professional monitoring and casual listening.
Frequency Response: Both models cover a wide 15 Hz – 28 kHz range, enabling them to reproduce deep bass, clear mids, and crisp high frequencies.
Impedance: Both have a 38-ohm impedance, allowing them to be driven easily by portable devices as well as professional studio equipment without the need for a dedicated amplifier.
Detachable Cable System: Both include a locking detachable cable design, providing a secure connection and easy cable replacement for extended product longevity.
Included Cable Options: Both come with three cables—1.2 m straight, 3.0 m straight, and 1.2 m coiled—offering flexibility for different listening environments.
Connector Type: Both use a 3.5 mm gold-plated plug with a screw-on 6.3 mm adapter, ensuring compatibility with both consumer and professional audio setups.
Closed-Back Design: Both employ a closed-back enclosure, reducing sound leakage and providing better sound isolation for focused listening.
Replaceable Ear Pads: Both support ear pad replacement, allowing users to maintain comfort and performance over time.
Common Features
| Feature | Audio-Technica M60x | Audio-Technica M50x |
| Driver Type | Dynamic, large-aperture | Dynamic, large-aperture |
| Driver Size | 45 mm | 45 mm |
| Frequency Response | 15 Hz – 28 kHz | 15 Hz – 28 kHz |
| Impedance | 38 ohms | 38 ohms |
| Cable Connection | Detachable with locking mechanism | Detachable with locking mechanism |
| Included Cables | 1.2 m straight, 3.0 m straight, 1.2 m coiled | 1.2 m straight, 3.0 m straight, 1.2 m coiled |
| Connector Type | 3.5 mm gold-plated with screw-on 6.3 mm adapter | 3.5 mm gold-plated with screw-on 6.3 mm adapter |
| Closed-Back Design | Yes | Yes |
| Audio-Technica Build Quality | Professional-grade materials | Professional-grade materials |
| Cable Port Location | Left ear cup | Left ear cup |
| Replaceable Ear Pads | Yes | Yes |
| Compatibility | Works with professional audio gear and portable devices | Works with professional audio gear and portable devices |
| Price | Check Technica M60x Price | Check Technika M50x Price |
FAQ
Are the Audio-Technica ATH-M60x and ATH-M50x designed for professional use? Do both headphones have the same driver size? Which model is more lightweight? Are the cables interchangeable between the two models? Do they provide the same frequency response? Which headphone provides better sound isolation? Do both models have a foldable design? Are the ear pads replaceable on both models? Do both headphones have the same impedance? Which model has a more neutral sound signature? Do both come with multiple cable options? Are both models closed-back designs? Is the clamp pressure the same for both models? Do both come with the same connector type? Which is better for travel use? |
